66 Wellington St East
July 8, 2021
July 8, 2021
July 2, 2021
SENER is a private engineering and technology group founded in 1956. It seeks to offer its clients the most advanced technological solutions and enjoys international recognition for its commitment to innovation, its quality and for its independence.
SENER has nearly 2,500 professionals across its centers in Algeria, Argentina, Brazil, South Korea, Canada, Colombia, Chile, China, the United Arab Emirates, Spain, the United States, Morocco, Mexico, Poland, Portugal, the United Kingdom and South Africa. It accomplishes Aerospace and Engineering and Construction activities and has industrial holdings in companies working in the field of Energy and Environment.
In 2013, SENER Group created SENER (Shanghai) Systems Company Limited to provide high quality services to Chinese clients. SENER (Shanghai) needed finance & tax consultation, accounting and personnel services to support its development. It engaged Brighture to provide these services in 2016.
Brighture provides SENER with their management accounts, tax compliance and reporting, as well as tax advisory and planning services to help mitigate tax liabilities.
“We are very focused on ensuring that we understand our client’s needs so we can be responsive and proactive with advice and solutions. Our job is to help improve our clients’ efficiency and ensure we help grow their business.“
“With respect of opinion of Brighture service, we are more than satisfactory with the service provided by Brighture. We have very easy communication with Brighture. All the reports prepared by Brighture are well organized, sent in time. The data are all correct, etc. In one word, we are very happy working with Brighture.”
Mr.Guangwu Liu
GM at SENER (Shanghai) Systems Company Limited
Otafuku Foods Co. Ltd was founded in 1922 in Japan. It mainly provides liquid, solid and semi-solid seasoning products such as sauces and vinegars for condiment manufacturers and other food companies. It has developed into one of the largest seasoning products manufacturers in Japan and continues to grow in North America.
In order to promote a Japanese food culture in China and develop the Chinese market, Otafuku Foods Co., Ltd established Otafuku Foods (Qingdao) Co., Ltd in China in 2012.
As a Japanese production enterprise, it is really critical to have standardized financial accounting processes that can accurately deal with local tax policies and regulations in China and ensure strong tax compliance. Otafuku Foods (Qingdao) Co., Ltd appointed Brighture to help them with this.
Brighture’s team consists of financial and tax consultants, senior accountants and auditors who collaborate to ensure problems are solved quickly, who understand the company’s business model and more importantly can provide solutions to help improve and enhance operations.
Over the last 9 years, Otafuku Foods and Brighture have worked closely together on the growth of their business, their markets and their customers. Brighture has also helped them to develop new ideas and additional partners to help them grow new business areas, such as high-tech providers and maternity leave outsourcing services.
“Since its establishment in 2012, Otafuku Foods (Qingdao) Co., Ltd has been consulted and guided by Brighture in accounting, taxation, auditing and other aspects of finance and taxation. With professional services, Brighture answers relevant financial and tax questions, standardizes financial accounting of enterprises, helps enterprises prevent and control financial and tax risks, and establishes a foundation for the development of enterprises, which is worthy of customers’ trust and long-term cooperation.”
Mr. Huiming Luo
GM at Otafuku Foods (Qingdao) Co., Ltd
June 11, 2021
In May this year, the IASB issued updates to IFRS-16, with regard to rent concessions, and to IAS-12, which covers leases as part of income tax reporting.
The international financial reporting standards (IFRS) are a set of international accounting standards issued by the IFRS Foundation and the International Accounting Standards Board (IASB). They’re intended to bring transparency, make international comparisons more straightforward and give investors the information they need to make decisions.
The standards are frequently updated, as in the case of these two recent changes – but what do those amendments mean in practice?
IAS-12 established how an individual company should account for income tax, including any deferred tax representing tax payable or which is later recoverable.
In certain circumstances, companies aren’t obliged to recognise deferred tax (that is, to record them in the financial statements that form the body of their accounts) the first time they recognise assets or liabilities.
In the past, whether the exemption applied to leases and decommissioning obligations, which companies recognise as both asset and liability, was something of a grey area.
This amendment removes that ambiguity, making it absolutely clear that companies are expected to recognise deferred tax on transactions of this type.
The amendments take effect for annual reporting periods beginning on or after 1 January 2023. Companies can choose to apply the amendments before that date under the principles of ‘early application’.
On 31 March 2021 the IFRS issued ‘Covid-19-Related Rent Concessions beyond 30 June 2021’.
This amendment to IFRS-16 extends a ‘practical expedient’ (effectively an emergency measure) by a year, first announced in May 2020 as part of the global response to COVID-19.
The expedient recognised the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on businesses. Many sought rent concessions from landlords as part of an effort to control cashflow as, for example, footfall in city centres dropped drastically due to national lockdowns.
Under the practical expedient, lessees were not required to assess whether rent concessions counted as ‘lease modifications’ for accounting purposes.
Without this amendment, the concession would have expired at the end of June 2021, while many world economies are still grappling with COVID-19 or its aftermath.
Under the terms of the recent amendment, a lessee can apply the expedient to COVID-19-related rent concessions for which a reduction in lease payments affects only payments originally due on or before 30 June 2022.
The lessee is required to apply the amendment for annual reporting periods beginning on or after 1 April 2021.
They must also apply the amendment retrospectively, with the cumulative effect of its initial application being recognised as an adjustment to the opening balance retained earnings. Disclosure requirements under paragraph 28(f)1 of IAS-8, ‘Accounting Policies, Changes in Accounting Estimates and Errors, don’t apply on this initial application.
Contact your local Kreston audit contact (or admin@kreston.com) for more information or to talk about how these changes might affect your company accounts.
The range of support that businesses have received from governments around the world in response to the Coronavirus pandemic has been largely effective, according to key voices from across our network.
We recently conducted an informal poll featuring 41 of our senior leaders, of whom the majority (59%) stated that the schemes such as furlough, tax relief and emergency business loans have been “very effective” in helping clients weather the pandemic. The figure is even greater among EMEA-based respondents (63%), who describe such initiatives as “very effective.” Globally, only about 30% said that such schemes had little to no impact for clients, and about 12% said that clients had not utilised the available schemes at all.
Our leaders believe that the technology, media, and telecoms (78% of those asked), as well as life sciences (66%), are the sectors that stand in poll position to kickstart the global economic recovery. In contrast, manufacturing is not anticipated to be a major driver of post-pandemic growth (with only 37% believing in its potential). Only 15% of respondents said that the retail industry would play a significant role in the economic recovery globally.
Liza Robbins, Chief Executive of Kreston, said:
“Throughout this crisis, we have seen unprecedented levels of government intervention to stave off economic disaster across the globe, with schemes aimed at, and often succeeding in, supporting businesses and protecting jobs. These figures bear out in our conversations within the Kreston network, indicating that, despite the challenges, many schemes have often been successful – particularly across EMEA. With the worst of the pandemic’s economic impact hopefully now behind us, Technology, Media, and Telecoms, and Life Sciences appear poised to play an important role in the next phase of economic recovery and post-pandemic growth around the globe.”
June 10, 2021
Kreston Global collaborates with CBIZ in the US market. CBIZ is not a member of Kreston Global.
May 12, 2021
By Guillermo Narvaez – Technical Director of the Kreston International Global Tax Group
Digital Services Taxes (DSTs) are a new global initiative designed to charge larger technology companies that provide digital platforms such as social media, advertising, online marketplaces and other search engine tools for commercial transactions or selling user data online advertising. It is beginning to apply across the world at the behest of the G20 – the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) who are calling for changes to the international tax system to address the challenges of the digitisation of the economy by mid-2021.
A simple enough idea – impose additional tax costs on those who earn more – but is it really this simple? Who actually pays this tax, as on the face of it, it is the customers themselves who face liability rather than the platforms on which they are advertising.
Online platforms essential for SMEs to grow
Big tech companies like Amazon, Google and Apple shift the tax burden instigated by DSTs downstream to their customers, many of whom are SMEs. The European Centre for International Political Economy (ECIPE) has stated that “the EU’s commercial landscape is characterised by an overall share of highly diverse SMEs who account for 99.8% of all EU enterprises and 66.6% of overall EU employment.”
Copenhagen Economics also point out that 82% of SMEs in Europe use search engines to promote products and services online, while 42% of SMEs use online marketplaces to sell their products and services.
So we can see that SMEs are disproportionately affected by DSTs and are the ones left with the bill.
But in reality, to what extent are DSTs targeting the big fish? The DSTs’ purpose is well-meaning – challenge some of the world’s largest multinational enterprises (MNEs) to pay their dues.
However, when these enterprises can just pass this on to others – particularly digitally dependent SMEs who cannot otherwise achieve their goals – the DST is surely not having its desired effect?
Not looking at the profitability of the platforms means that the DST may end up being a disproportionate levy and, as a result, drive a possible deceleration of economic growth.
SMEs are inadvertent “victims” of the new tax levy
So what is the thinking behind this new levy? Many SMEs exist either in the middle of the digital services supply chain or to ensure the delivery of a product or service to its final customer. Where tech companies at one end of the chain and final customers at the other, SMEs sit between the two, paying for services (such as advertising) provided by the tech companies.
The logic of the DST is, in part, that tax on profitability (such as income tax) do not have the reach to impose tax burdens on tech companies for digital services. However, tech companies can circumvent the economic burden of the DST by transferring the levy to their customers, as they currently do with SMEs.
Conversely, whilst tech companies can pass on the levy to SMEs by increasing the cost of their services and so cover their tax liability, SMEs cannot similarly shift the burden downstream to their customers, as doing so may well take away their competitive advantage.
A well-meaning but flawed tax concept
Finally, even though consumers successfully use one or more digital service, they do not usually have to pay anything at all. Most of these can access any information, products and services through the use of free online services.
While SMEs serve a vital purpose in domestic economies, they are often the primary victims of this tax burden, whereas tech companies escape cost-free. Hence this system of taxation is a flawed one and deeply unfair.
SMEs are part of the digital services supply chain and a vital element of any country seeking to pursue economic growth while achieving a healthy economy. Since over 99% of EU businesses are SMEs, surely it would be fairer to support their development, rather than leave them to have to shoulder most of the actual tax burden?
(a version of this article also appeared in Accountancy Daily, May 12th 2021)
